MySQL语句加锁的实现分析

站长资源 2024/11/24 佚名

2 0 1

摘要： MySQL两条SQL语句锁的分析

看一下下面的SQL语句加什么锁

SLQ1：select * from t1 where id = 10;
SQL2：delete from t1 where id = 10;

（1）id 是不是主键

（2）当前系统的隔离级别是什么

（3）id列如果不是主键，那么id列上有索引吗

（4）id列上如果有二级索引，那么这个索引是二级索引吗

（5）两个SQL的执行计划是什么？索引扫描还是全表扫描

实际的执行计划需要根据MySQL的输出为准

组合一：id列是主键，RC隔离级别
组合二：id列是二级唯一索引，RC隔离级别
组合三：id列是二级非唯一索引，RC隔离级别
组合四：id列没有索引，RC隔离级别
组合五：id列是主键，RR隔离级别
组合六：id列是二级唯一索引，RR隔离级别
组合七：id列是二级非唯一索引，RR隔离级别
组合八：id列上没有索引，RR隔离级别

Serializable隔离级别

在RR RC隔离级别下，SQL1：select 均不加锁，采用的是快照读；以下仅讨论SQL2：delete操作的加锁
Percona

组合一：id主键+RC
Percona

---TRANSACTION 1286310, ACTIVE 9 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 341, OS thread handle 0x7f4d540d0700, query id 4510972 localhost root cleaning up
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t1` trx id 1286310 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 29 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t1` trx id 1286310 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap

MySQL

---TRANSACTION 5936, ACTIVE 171 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 2, OS thread handle 0x7f5677201700, query id 364 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t1` trx id 5936 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 6 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t1` trx id 5936 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001730; asc   0;;
 2: len 7; hex 26000001550110; asc &  U ;;
 3: len 1; hex 61; asc a;;

组合二：id唯一索引+RC
在唯一索引上的更新需要两个X锁，一个对应唯一索引id=10 记录，一个对应于聚簇索引name='d'的记录
Percona

---TRANSACTION 1286327, ACTIVE 3 sec
3 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 344, OS thread handle 0x7f4d5404e700, query id 4510986 localhost root cleaning up
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t2` trx id 1286327 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 30 page no 4 n bits 80 index `id` of table `test`.`t2` trx id 1286327 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
RECORD LOCKS space id 30 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t2` trx id 1286327 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap

MySQL

---TRANSACTION 5938, ACTIVE 3 sec
3 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 2, OS thread handle 0x7f5677201700, query id 374 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t2` trx id 5938 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 7 page no 4 n bits 80 index `id` of table `test`.`t2` trx id 5938 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 7 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;
 1: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;

RECORD LOCKS space id 7 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t2` trx id 5938 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 7 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001732; asc   2;;
 2: len 7; hex 27000001560110; asc '  V ;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

组合三：id非唯一索引+RC
ID列为普通索引，那么对应的所有满足SQL查询条件的记录，都会被加锁；同时，这些记录在主键索引上的记录，也会被加锁
Percona

---TRANSACTION 1286339, ACTIVE 9 sec
3 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 4 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 347, OS thread handle 0x7f4b67fff700, query id 4511015 localhost root cleaning up
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t3` trx id 1286339 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 31 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_key` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 1286339 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
RECORD LOCKS space id 31 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 1286339 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap

MySQL

---TRANSACTION 5940, ACTIVE 3 sec
3 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 4 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 2, OS thread handle 0x7f5677201700, query id 378 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t3` trx id 5940 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 8 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_key` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 5940 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;
 1: len 1; hex 62; asc b;;

Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;
 1: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;

RECORD LOCKS space id 8 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 5940 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 62; asc b;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001734; asc   4;;
 2: len 7; hex 28000001570110; asc (  W ;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001734; asc   4;;
 2: len 7; hex 28000001570132; asc (  W 2;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

组合四：id无索引+RC
Percona

---TRANSACTION 1286373, ACTIVE 5 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 348, OS thread handle 0x7f4d54193700, query id 4511037 localhost root cleaning up
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t4` trx id 1286373 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 33 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t4` trx id 1286373 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap

MySQL

---TRANSACTION 5946, ACTIVE 2 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 2 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 2, OS thread handle 0x7f5677201700, query id 382 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t4` trx id 5946 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 9 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t4` trx id 5946 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 62; asc b;;
 1: len 6; hex 00000000173a; asc   :;;
 2: len 7; hex 2b0000015a0110; asc +  Z ;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;
 1: len 6; hex 00000000173a; asc   :;;
 2: len 7; hex 2b0000015a012c; asc +  Z ,;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

组合五：id主键+RR
参考组合一

组合六：id唯一索引+RR
参考组合二

组合七：id非唯一索引+RR
Percona

---TRANSACTION 1592633, ACTIVE 24 sec
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 5 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 794, OS thread handle 0x7f4d5404e700, query id 7801799 localhost root cleaning up
Trx read view will not see trx with id >= 1592634, sees < 1592634
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t3` trx id 1592633 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 31 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_key` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 1592633 lock_mode X
RECORD LOCKS space id 31 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 1592633 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
RECORD LOCKS space id 31 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_key` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 1592633 lock_mode X locks gap before rec

MySQL

---TRANSACTION 5985, ACTIVE 7 sec
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1184, 5 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 12, OS thread handle 0x7f56770fd700, query id 500 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t3` trx id 5985 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 8 page no 4 n bits 80 index `idx_key` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 5985 lock_mode X
Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;
 1: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;

Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;
 1: len 1; hex 62; asc b;;

RECORD LOCKS space id 8 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t3` trx id 5985 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001761; asc   a;;
 2: len 7; hex 3f0000016d0132; asc "htmlcode">

---TRANSACTION 1592639, ACTIVE 4 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 7 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 794, OS thread handle 0x7f4d5404e700, query id 7801804 localhost root cleaning up
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t4` trx id 1592639 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 33 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t4` trx id 1592639 lock_mode X



MySQL




---TRANSACTION 6000, ACTIVE 3 sec
2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 7 row lock(s), undo log entries 2
MySQL thread id 12, OS thread handle 0x7f56770fd700, query id 546 localhost root
TABLE LOCK table `test`.`t4` trx id 6000 lock mode IX
RECORD LOCKS space id 9 page no 3 n bits 80 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`t4` trx id 6000 lock_mode X
Record lock, heap no 1 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 1; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 73757072656d756d; asc supremum;;

Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 61; asc a;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001722; asc   ";;
 2: len 7; hex 9e0000014e0110; asc   N ;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000f; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 3 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 62; asc b;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001770; asc   p;;
 2: len 7; hex 47000001730110; asc G  s ;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 4 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 63; asc c;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001722; asc   ";;
 2: len 7; hex 9e0000014e0122; asc   N ";;
 3: len 4; hex 80000006; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 5 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 32
 0: len 1; hex 64; asc d;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001770; asc   p;;
 2: len 7; hex 4700000173012c; asc G  s ,;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000a; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 6 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 66; asc f;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001722; asc   ";;
 2: len 7; hex 9e0000014e0134; asc   N 4;;
 3: len 4; hex 8000000b; asc   ;;

Record lock, heap no 7 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 4; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 2; hex 7a7a; asc zz;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000001722; asc   ";;
 2: len 7; hex 9e0000014e013d; asc   N =;;
 3: len 4; hex 80000002; asc   ;;




组合九：Serializable


针对前面提到的简单的SQL，最后一个情况：Serializable隔离级别。对于SQL2：delete from t1 where id = 10; 来说，Serializable隔离级别与Repeatable Read隔离级别完全一致，因此不做介绍。
Serializable隔离级别，影响的是SQL1：select * from t1 where id = 10; 这条SQL，在RC，RR隔离级别下，都是快照读，不加锁。但是在Serializable隔离级别，SQL1会加读锁，也就是说快照读不复存在，MVCC并发控制降级为Lock-Based CC。
结论：在MySQL/InnoDB中，所谓的读不加锁，并不适用于所有的情况，而是隔离级别相关的。Serializable隔离级别，读不加锁就不再成立，所有的读操作，都是当前读。

mysql,加锁sql语句,sql语句加锁,数据库加锁的sql语句

广告合作：本站广告合作请联系QQ：858582 申请时备注：广告合作（否则不回）
免责声明：本站资源来自互联网收集,仅供用于学习和交流,请遵循相关法律法规,本站一切资源不代表本站立场,如有侵权、后门、不妥请联系本站删除！

评论“MySQL语句加锁的实现分析”

暂无评论...

《魔兽世界》大逃杀！60人新游玩模式《强袭风暴》3月21日上线

暴雪近日发布了《魔兽世界》10.2.6 更新内容，新游玩模式《强袭风暴》即将于3月21 日在亚服上线，届时玩家将前往阿拉希高地展开一场 60 人大逃杀对战。

艾泽拉斯的冒险者已经征服了艾泽拉斯的大地及遥远的彼岸。他们在对抗世界上最致命的敌人时展现出过人的手腕，并且成功阻止终结宇宙等级的威胁。当他们在为即将于《魔兽世界》资料片《地心之战》中来袭的萨拉塔斯势力做战斗准备时，他们还需要在熟悉的阿拉希高地面对一个全新的敌人──那就是彼此。在《巨龙崛起》10.2.6 更新的《强袭风暴》中，玩家将会进入一个全新的海盗主题大逃杀式限时活动，其中包含极高的风险和史诗级的奖励。
《强袭风暴》不是普通的战场，作为一个独立于主游戏之外的活动，玩家可以用大逃杀的风格来体验《魔兽世界》，不分职业、不分装备（除了你在赛局中捡到的），光是技巧和战略的强弱之分就能决定出谁才是能坚持到最后的赢家。本次活动将会开放单人和双人模式，玩家在加入海盗主题的预赛大厅区域前，可以从强袭风暴角色画面新增好友。游玩游戏将可以累计名望轨迹，《巨龙崛起》和《魔兽世界：巫妖王之怒经典版》的玩家都可以获得奖励。

更新日志

2024年11月24日

MySQL语句加锁的实现分析

详解mysql中的冗余和重复索引

MySQL导出数据遇到secure-file-priv问题的解决方法

评论“MySQL语句加锁的实现分析”

《魔兽世界》大逃杀！60人新游玩模式《强袭风暴》3月21日上线

更新日志

友情链接